|
High Frontier Academics
A Director’s Note
The High
Frontier view of academics
is multi-faceted in regards
to both the obligation of
the adult to teach, and the
student’s obligation to
learn. Consistent with the
over-arching Positive Peer
Culture Model, our academic
delivery recognizes that we
are social animals.
Consequently, we respond
accordingly utilizing
“social interest” as the
catalyst to promote a
newfound educational
interest among our students.
As opposed to so many common
educational systems that
attempt to motivate through
policy, procedure, reward,
and consequence, High
Frontier harnesses this
tremendous social power as
the cornerstone to finding
the student’s interest and
willingness to learn. We
cannot find the perfect
policy, test, reward, or
consequence that will compel
a student’s educational
interest. Unfortunately,
this seems to be the current
drive among our typical high
school institutions and the
bureaucracies governing
them.
Partnership and authority
are both necessary and yet
commonly viewed more
antagonistically to one
another than they should be.
As I reflect upon my own
high school experience,
those adults with whom the
student had the greatest
partnership also
maintained the greatest
authority and consequently
the greatest influence. My
memory from attendance in a
large high school was that
the typical teacher had no
systemic ability to develop
relationships. We were indeed
strangers to each other.
Individual student
misbehavior or apathy was
met with a reminder of
“policy and procedure,”
followed by the threat of
the adult teacher to tattle
tale to the vice principal
who would judge and punish
the infraction. And yet, the
joker in the classroom
seldom “saw the light.”
I remember many peers from
my high school experience,
but I remember nobody from
my classroom experience. Not
one peer knew whether I was
making an “A” or “F.” My
peers, however, knew much
about me outside the
academic class. They knew my
friends; they knew my
extra-curricular activities;
they knew what girl I
thought was best; they knew
who I listened to on the
radio and quite often they
knew my parents. They were a
great influence on me except
in what was my adolescent
job of education. Most of my
peers were somewhat
apathetic to education.
“We’ll just get by.” “We
gave a 50% effort at best.”
What is it about our
educational systems that
fail to utilize this social
influence in what should
otherwise be the most
important part of the day?
There was, however, an
exception to this norm. The
exception was found among
the student’s most hated
part of the day. How could
one enjoy the pain,
dehydration, bruises, and
admonishment that
accompanied their
participation in athletics?
The exception was found on
the field and court every
day at the end of school.
Athletic practice found the
students giving 100%. The
coach was typically one who
never relied on “policy and
procedure” to maintain
authority. Yet, he or she
was never bucked. This same
coach was typically the only
adult with whom we had a
partnership. The
coach was to develop the
strategy; the student was to
implement it. Cooperation
and success were one with
the student and adult. I can
remember each and every one
of my coaches and the things
they told me. I remember
their wives and kids names.
I remember well all of my
fellow players. I don’t
remember, however, any of my
teacher’s names. The source
of this memory and 100%
effort was “team.” At High
Frontier, we borrow the Adlerian term of “Social
Interest.” It is a
psychological precept that
seems much too absent in
today’s education. We
introduce this concept into
the classroom.
Cordially, Barry
|